A recent hot topic has been the amount of debt that Canadians. According to recent articles I’ve read, average Canadians have a debt to income ratio of 151%. That means for every $1 dollar that a Canadian makes, they have $1.51 worth of debt. This is actually above what the average that Americans had when the bubble burst and everything crashed in 2008. While this sounds terrifying (and I do think it’s a scary statistic), there is more to it than that. Like all stats, you really have to peel away some of the layers to see what is happening.
First, as everyone knows, not all debts are equal. Here in Canada, we have a higher percentage of homeowners, which would result in larger mortgages. $100,000 in mortgage debt is ALOT different from $100,000 of credit card/line of credit debt. Completely different scenarios, yet when these stats are published, they are all lumped together. Furthermore, when comparing US mortgages lending practices to Canadian lending practices, Canadian mortgage lending is much more conservative, and more stringent then our friends south of the border.
One of the ideas that Federal Government is thinking about is reducing the amount that Canadians can borrow against their homes on Lines of Credit. These Home-Equity Lines of Credits(also known as a Heloc) allow a person to use the equity in their home to borrow money. From personal experience, I often see people do this to pay off credit cards, and other forms of higher interest rate debt. Currently, a person can borrow up to 80% of their homes value in this Heloc product. One of the things that is being thrown around is that we reduce that number to 65%, which “SHOULD” reduce debt as people can borrow less. This absolutely makes sense. People would have less debt if they are allowed to borrow less on their homes.
Now here is my issue with this. While I do have concerns over the amount of debt that Canadians are carrying, and this is by no means down playing that, my larger concern is the amount of money that Canadians spend on their debt every month. Just say a person makes $5000 a month. They owe $100,000 in debts. $75,000 on a mortgage, $5,000 on credit cards, and $15,000 on a line of credit. To pay all these bills, this person has to pay $2500 a month. In a different scenario, this person still makes $5000 a month. However, this time they only have $50,000 on their mortgage, $15,000 in credit cards, and $20,000 on a line of credit. Now while we have limited the amount this person can have on their mortgage, by doing this, this person has still overspend and has a larger proportion of their debts on higher interest debt products like credit cards and line of credits, they end up having to pay $2700 a month. In scenario 2, while the person owns more of their home, their monthly payments are actually higher then scenario 1. I am most concerned about this scenario. As rates start to move up, I am more concerned with the ability for Canadians to pay their debts, then the actual amount of debt they have.
Instead of focusing on the amount of debt that Canadians have, perhaps we should focus on the amount their debts cost them. Instead of reducing the amount of money people can borrow against their home, we should look to limit the amount that people can qualify based on their income to debt payment ratios. If 50% of your income goes towards paying the minimum payments on your debts, I do not really care how much debt you have because you are most likely never going to be able to reduce your debt and that is something we should all be concerned about.
The Financial Rebel